<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Sunday Chart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spiralcalendar.com/2008/10/a-sunday-chart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spiralcalendar.com/2008/10/a-sunday-chart/</link>
	<description>Christopher Carolan on Financial Markets &#38; Lunar Cycles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 09:30:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: IRL</title>
		<link>http://spiralcalendar.com/2008/10/a-sunday-chart/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>IRL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiralcalendar.com/?p=884#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s assume earnings only fall by 50% in the coming recession/depression (which is probably optimistic). This means the S+P need only fall to 200-250 to bring PEs from 20 to 10. Oh dear!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s assume earnings only fall by 50% in the coming recession/depression (which is probably optimistic). This means the S+P need only fall to 200-250 to bring PEs from 20 to 10. Oh dear!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: molecool</title>
		<link>http://spiralcalendar.com/2008/10/a-sunday-chart/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>molecool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiralcalendar.com/?p=884#comment-130</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s pretty much it. Also matches Prechter&#039;s (and my own) wave analysis. BTW, I did buy your book was tough to get) and would be curious as to what the gap is between your work back then and additional discoveries you&#039;ve made in past years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s pretty much it. Also matches Prechter&#8217;s (and my own) wave analysis. BTW, I did buy your book was tough to get) and would be curious as to what the gap is between your work back then and additional discoveries you&#8217;ve made in past years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

